The Palestine-Israel Journal is a quarterly of MIDDLE EAST PUBLICATIONS, a registered non-profit organization (No. 58-023862-4).
Bookmark and Share

Editorial Board

Adnan Abdelrazek

Danny Rubinstein

Sam'an Khoury

Daniel Bar-Tal

Galia Golan

Gershon Baskin

Hind Khoury

Edy Kaufman

Ata Qaymari

Benjamin Pogrund

Nafez Nazzal

Dan Jacobson

Jumana Jaouni

Moshe Maoz

Munther Dajani

Khuloud Khayyat Dajani

Izhak Schnell

Lucy Nusseibah

Meir Margalit

Menachem Klein

Ali Abu Shahla

Ilan Baruch

Hanna Siniora

Yehudit Oppenheimer

Mossi Raz

Susie Becher

Frances Raday

Date:2007-11-12 /


Implications of the Annapolis Conference

     by Jumana Az Jaouni

Palestinians are divided over the Annapolis conference on what exactly ‘we are looking for’. While President Abbas and the PA are keen to achieve a Declaration of Principles, or an understanding on final status issues, many are skeptical on the need to address these issues at this time. Refugees and Jerusalem are two taboos in Palestinian political culture. The general view is that such issues need to be addressed on a regional if not an international level, and not at a time of internal divisions within the Palestinian political society, and at a time of Palestinian weakness. Very few people have confidence that discussing these issues at this stage with the Olmert government would bring any good, as the Olmert government is not seen by Palestinians as a strongly led, representative government of Israel. There is growing fear that any discussion of the issues would entail further concessions. Better left unsaid, is the more popular view.

The definition of success is creating the means, e.g., a timetable and mechanisms for moving forward. For the Palestinians, an Israeli commitment to the first phase of the road map, freezing all settlement activities, returning to the September 28, 2000, redeployment lines, and renewing the liaison between the two sides is not enough. At a minimum there should be an action plan for an implementation follow up process. For tangible success to be seen and felt, progress needs to be made in addressing final status issues through engagement in serious negotiations that conclude in a final settlement to the conflict.

If the conference produces nothing, it would not be a major set back for any side, expectations are already too low. The Annapolis conference will fall under the category of ‘another lost opportunity’.

However, the Bush administration, the Israeli and Palestinian political leaders are capable of making the ‘no outcomes’ into bad outcomes when addressing the media.

On the ground, however, the cancellation of the opposition conference planned for November in Damascus lifts some pressure from President Abbas. In general, the conference is not a ‘make it or break it’ stop. Yet, another failure would add to the current frustration and disappointment from both leaders on the possibility for agreement between the two sides.

 © 2012 Palestine-Israel Journal. All Rights Reserved. Articles, excerpts, and translations may not be reproduced in any form without written permission.
The Palestine-Israel Journal gratefully acknowledges the support of UNESCO for the initial development of the website.
The Palestine-Israel Journal gratefully acknowledges the support of the European Union for the maintenance and development
of the website.